Reposted by Robert Costa
The statement by Trump at Davos addresses international relations between the United States and Canada, touching on issues of trade and diplomacy. The tone is confrontational and suggests a sense of entitlement, implying that Canada owes gratitude to the United States. This statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues related to international relations and diplomacy.
- The statement could be seen as causing harm by fostering tension between countries, which may not align with striving to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does lack respect for the dignity of Canadian leadership. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is accusatory and lacks diplomatic tact. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead opting for a confrontational approach. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence in a way that could strain international relations rather than bettering society. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but may not use the platform responsibly, as it could damage diplomatic relations. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.