Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the impact of political figures on global health, specifically referencing George W. Bush's PEPFAR program. It contrasts this with a claim made by Lara Trump about another president's impact. The tone is factual and aims to provide evidence to support the claim about Bush's contributions.
- The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on factual information about PEPFAR's impact. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by providing specific data on the lives saved by the PEPFAR program. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by presenting evidence to counter a claim, without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.