Jake Tapper

Rank 5 of 47
|
Score 174

The statement questions the approach of treating allies harshly while being lenient with adversaries. It implies a critique of foreign policy strategies, suggesting a need for consistency and fairness in diplomatic relations.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement raises concerns about potential harm in diplomatic relations, suggesting a need for more balanced treatment. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by questioning current practices and encouraging reflection on diplomatic strategies. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of foreign policy without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]