Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement and accompanying images discuss the revocation of a student's visa based on an op-ed, highlighting issues of free speech and government overreach. The tone is critical of the government's actions, suggesting a lack of evidence for the visa revocation and detention.
- The statement aims to highlight potential harm caused by government actions, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy and dignity by focusing on government actions rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by drawing attention to issues of free speech and potential injustice. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism of government actions without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to raise awareness about potential government overreach, contributing to societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.