Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement by Ambassador Nick Burns and the subsequent response engage in public discourse as they address the public issue of NATO's role and contributions in Afghanistan, countering President Trump's comments. The tone is respectful and honors the sacrifices of NATO troops, aiming to correct misconceptions and promote understanding of international alliances.
- The statement honors the memory of NATO troops and does no harm, aligning with the principle. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By honoring NATO troops and correcting misconceptions, the statement promotes understanding and empathy. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by countering a public figure's comments without personal attacks. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement implicitly acknowledges and corrects a misconception about NATO's contributions. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.