The statement engages in public discourse by addressing a significant public issue related to government violence against civilians in Iran. It expresses a strong opinion against the Iranian regime, suggesting they are untrustworthy and that no deals should be made with them.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement uses strong language that could potentially harm diplomatic relations or incite further conflict, thus not fully adhering to the principle of doing no harm.
[-1]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does generalize about the Iranian regime, which could be seen as disrespectful to individuals within the regime who may not support such actions.
[-1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it takes a firm stance against the Iranian regime without acknowledging any complexities or nuances.
[-2]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it dismisses the possibility of any deal with the Iranian regime outright, which could be seen as a form of personal attack against the regime.
[-2]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The statement uses its influence to bring attention to a significant issue, potentially contributing to societal awareness and change, but it does so in a manner that could polarize rather than unite.
[+1]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not fully align with responsible and integrity-driven discourse, as it lacks nuance and could incite further division.
[-1]