Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement constitutes public discourse as it addresses a significant public health issue, specifically the recommendation on vaccine policies, which has implications for public safety and health policy.
- The statement potentially does harm by suggesting that vaccines, which are critical for preventing diseases, should be optional, thereby undermining public health efforts. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion as it dismisses the importance of vaccines in preventing serious illnesses and protecting vulnerable populations. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it presents a unilateral decision that contradicts established scientific consensus without engaging with opposing views. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence in a way that could negatively impact society by promoting a stance that could lead to decreased vaccination rates and increased disease outbreaks. [-2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but may not use the platform responsibly, as it challenges established scientific consensus without providing a robust rationale. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.