Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement engages with a public health issue by discussing Dr. Kirk Milhoan's controversial views on vaccines, which are a significant public concern. It references a podcast and a New York Times article, indicating a broader dialogue on vaccine policies.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but discusses a topic that could influence public health negatively if misinterpreted. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and does not engage in harassment or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding or empathy, as it presents a controversial view without additional context or counterarguments.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but does not facilitate constructive dialogue either.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight a significant public issue, potentially influencing public opinion. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by discussing a public figure's views, but it should ensure responsible presentation to avoid misinformation. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.