Marianne Williamson

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 55
1/24/2026, 6:04:34 PM
X
In reply to:
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
14d
These are the Dems who voted for the DHS $64.4B funding bill on Thursday: Reps Henry Cuellar (TX), Tom Suozzi (NY, Vicente Gonzalez (TX), Laura Gillen (NY Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (WA), Jared Golden (MA), and Don Davis (NC). 3/
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
14d
They are not a "law enforcement" operation; they are lawless thugs. Minnesotans will go down in history for their brave resistance to this madness. 2/
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
14d
Another ICE killing of a Minnesota protester. Nothing surprising given that ICE is an vastly undertrained and unvetted paramilitary force perpetrating a violent crackdown - for no reason at all - on the people of Minnesota. 1/

The statement is a call to action against certain political figures and ICE agents, suggesting they are associated with negative actions and ideologies. It engages in public discourse by addressing issues related to immigration enforcement and political accountability.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful, particularly by making broad accusations against ICE agents without specific evidence, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement accuses ICE agents of being insurrectionists or associated with hate groups, which could be considered a form of harassment or hate speech, violating the principle of respecting privacy and dignity. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses accusatory language and does not seek to understand the perspectives of those it criticizes. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes personal attacks and broad accusations without engaging in a reasoned debate. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to call for political action, which could be seen as an attempt to better society, but the approach is divisive and accusatory. [-1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be responsible or uphold integrity, given the lack of evidence for the claims made. [-1]