Marianne Williamson

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 55
1/24/2026, 6:15:30 PM
X
In reply to:
Rick Smith
@PLURguy87
·
14d
@marwilliamson No, the reason they wear masks is because your cult shows up at their homes and commits violence against them and their families.

Maybe it’s time for us to give you the same treatment.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
14d
If anyone with a conscience is considering primarying them this year, please DO! The reason those ICE agents wear masks is because of how many of them were Jan. 6 insurrectionists, or known Proud Boys etc. The name of anyone supporting this horror will live on in a cloud of
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
14d
These are the Dems who voted for the DHS $64.4B funding bill on Thursday: Reps Henry Cuellar (TX), Tom Suozzi (NY, Vicente Gonzalez (TX), Laura Gillen (NY Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (WA), Jared Golden (MA), and Don Davis (NC). 3/
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
14d
They are not a "law enforcement" operation; they are lawless thugs. Minnesotans will go down in history for their brave resistance to this madness. 2/
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
14d
Another ICE killing of a Minnesota protester. Nothing surprising given that ICE is an vastly undertrained and unvetted paramilitary force perpetrating a violent crackdown - for no reason at all - on the people of Minnesota. 1/

The statement is part of a public discourse involving a debate on the actions and perception of ICE agents, which is a public issue. The tone is accusatory and dismissive, aiming to discredit the previous speaker by implying they are spreading false narratives.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it uses a derogatory tone and dismisses the other person's viewpoint without evidence. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it engages in a form of verbal attack by calling the other person a 'good boy' in a condescending manner. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it resorts to personal attacks rather than addressing the argument presented. [-2]