Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement criticizes the passing of a DHS spending bill that increases funding for ICE, highlighting a lack of accountability and expressing gratitude to Michigan Democrats who voted against it. The tone is critical and politically charged, aiming to inform and rally opposition to the bill.
- The statement uses strong language ('more terror on our streets') which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but uses charged language that could be seen as disrespectful to those supporting the bill. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of the political stance of Michigan Democrats but does so in a divisive manner.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the bill and its supporters but does not engage in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.