In reply to:
Escaped NY, Southern Yankee
@79hockeymom19
·
14d
The statement engages in a public discourse about the legality of open carry and the implications of a protester's death in Minnesota, touching on Second Amendment rights and government actions.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but questions the evidence of a threat, which is a neutral stance.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in personal attacks or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement seeks to promote understanding by asking for evidence, which can lead to a more informed discussion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by questioning the evidence rather than attacking the person. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly questioning the evidence in a public debate. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.