Marianne Williamson

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 55

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the role of ICE in Minneapolis and its impact on law and order, contributing to a broader debate on immigration enforcement and public safety.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement suggests that ICE is stoking violence rather than reducing it, which could be seen as harmful if not substantiated, but it does not directly incite harm.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does criticize ICE's actions.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement attempts to promote understanding by challenging the effectiveness of ICE in maintaining law and order, but it could be more empathetic in its approach.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue by responding to a previous comment, but it could be seen as dismissive with the 'lol' and lacks constructive criticism. [-1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses free speech to question ICE's role, which is a responsible use of the platform, but the tone could be more respectful.