Marianne Williamson

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 55
1/24/2026, 8:47:01 PM
X
In reply to:
William_Herschel
@HerschHerschel2
·
13d
@marwilliamson @marwilliamson unless you support abolishing ICE outright, you are also gaslighting.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
13d
The problem is ICE being there to begin with. ICE is not needed in Minnesota, nor are they wanted there. It is not the role of the federal government to override local and state governments. 3/
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
13d
They are using the "We're there to get violent criminals off the street" mantra as a cover for a military crackdown on American citizens. 2/
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
13d
Do. not let them gaslight you. The idea that ICE is necessary to "get violent offenders off the street." State and local enforcement does that every day, and if the federal govt wants to ask how they can help then that's great. 1/

The statement 'At this point it should absolutely be abolished' is part of a public discourse on the role and necessity of ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) in the United States. The conversation involves a critique of federal intervention in local and state matters and questions the justification for ICE's presence. The statement supports the abolition of ICE, aligning with the broader debate on immigration enforcement and federal authority.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on a policy position, thus adhering to the principle of doing no harm with words. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, respecting the dignity of others involved in the discourse. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes a specific viewpoint but does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, remaining neutral on this principle.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement is a direct response to a policy issue and does not engage in personal attacks, adhering to constructive dialogue. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the platform to advocate for a societal change, which can be seen as using influence for societal betterment. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by expressing a viewpoint on a public issue responsibly. [+1]