In reply to:
Jake Tapper 🦅
@jaketapper
·
20h
Keith Edwards
@keithedwards
·
1d
The statement is part of a public discourse regarding a reported incident involving law enforcement and an armed individual. It describes a situation where an agent fired shots in defense, raising issues of public safety and law enforcement actions.
- The statement aims to explain the actions of law enforcement, which could be seen as an attempt to justify their actions and potentially reduce harm by providing context. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy by not disclosing personal details of the individuals involved, but it could be seen as lacking in empathy if it doesn't consider the broader implications of the incident.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on justifying the actions of law enforcement without addressing the perspectives of all parties involved. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but could be seen as lacking in constructive dialogue if it doesn't address potential concerns or criticisms of the incident.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.