Andrew Yang

The statement addresses a public issue by discussing the actions of law enforcement in a specific incident, referencing a video from Minnesota. It conveys a critical perspective on police conduct, suggesting that the actions seen in the video are not representative of proper law enforcement procedures. The statement aims to differentiate between appropriate and inappropriate police behavior, potentially contributing to the broader discourse on police reform and accountability.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement strives to do no harm by clarifying that the actions in the video are not representative of proper law enforcement, which can help prevent generalizations that could harm the reputation of law enforcement as a whole. [+1]
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes understanding by providing insight from a veteran police officer, which can foster empathy and a more nuanced view of law enforcement challenges. [+1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism by focusing on the actions seen in the video rather than attacking individuals personally, thus avoiding ad hominem arguments. [+1]