Marianne Williamson

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 55
1/29/2026, 5:58:17 PM
X
In reply to:
Spencer Andrews
@TruthIsLiberty4
·
6d
@marwilliamson I ask you to read this out loud, then look in the mirror, and ask yourself if you truly believe it: "Their goal is the militarization of blue cities and the submission of the American people."
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
6d
The PR has changed from “going after the violent criminals” to “going after the fraud” - as though armed agents in military gear rather than forensic accountants and prosecutors in business suits are the way to go after fraud.

But neither is their actual goal.

Their goal is the

The statement is part of a public discourse as it engages with a conversation about the militarization of cities and the intentions behind law enforcement strategies, which are public issues. The tone is challenging and somewhat confrontational, as it asks the original poster to reflect on their beliefs.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but challenges the other person to reflect on their beliefs, which can be seen as a neutral action in terms of harm.
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of dialogue by asking the other person to reflect, but it does so in a confrontational manner, which could be seen as a minor violation of constructive criticism and dialogue. [-1]