In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
12d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
12d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
12d
U.S. Department of Justice
@TheJusticeDept
·
13d
The statement is a skeptical response to a discussion about the redaction and release of the Epstein Files, suggesting a lack of transparency and accountability. It implies a need for further investigation and reform, aligning with public interest in justice and transparency.
- The statement indirectly supports the principle of doing no harm by advocating for transparency and accountability, which can lead to justice for victims. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy and dignity by highlighting the need for a proper investigation, though it does not directly address the concerns of survivors about exposure.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by supporting calls for transparency and reform. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive dialogue by questioning the adequacy of the current investigation and redaction process. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.