Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement questions the legal basis for redacting names of DOJ attorneys in the Epstein files, indicating a concern for transparency and accountability in legal proceedings. It references a journalist's findings, suggesting an investigative approach to uncovering details about the case.
- The statement seeks to promote transparency, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for accountability. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy by questioning the redaction process rather than revealing sensitive information. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement encourages understanding by prompting a discussion on legal transparency and accountability. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.