Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
House Judiciary GOP 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
@JudiciaryGOP
·
8d
The statement and accompanying images discuss the influence of European regulations on global online narratives, particularly focusing on the Digital Services Act (DSA) and its impact on content moderation by big tech companies. The tone suggests concern over potential censorship and its implications for free speech, especially in the U.S.
- The statement raises concerns about potential harm to free speech, suggesting a violation of this principle. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It questions the privacy and dignity of regulatory actions, implying they may lead to censorship, which could be seen as a violation. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on the negative implications of the regulations. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of European regulations but does not engage in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight concerns about regulatory impacts on free speech, aligning with this principle. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.