Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
House Judiciary GOP 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
@JudiciaryGOP
·
8d
The statement and accompanying images discuss alleged interference by the European Commission in elections and censorship, particularly focusing on the role of social media platforms like TikTok. The tone is critical of the European Commission, suggesting it pressures platforms to censor content and interferes in elections. The statement implies a lack of foreign interference in Romanian elections via TikTok, challenging previous claims.
- The statement aims to expose potential harm caused by alleged censorship and interference, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for transparency. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy by focusing on institutional actions rather than personal attacks, adhering to the principle of respecting privacy and dignity. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing information on the alleged actions of the European Commission, though it may lack balance.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the European Commission, which could be seen as constructive if it leads to dialogue, but it risks being perceived as one-sided. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By addressing issues of censorship and election interference, the statement uses its platform to potentially better society by advocating for free speech and fair elections. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.