Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement reports on internal changes at The Washington Post, including the closure of its sports section and other restructuring efforts. It highlights the impact on staff and the uncertainty they face, which could be seen as a commentary on the state of journalism and media industry challenges.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does convey distress among staff, which is a factual report rather than harmful intent.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not naming individuals or engaging in harassment or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does highlight the challenges faced by media workers.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments; it reports on organizational changes.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By reporting on significant changes in a major media outlet, the statement uses its influence to inform the public about industry trends. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly reporting on internal changes at a major newspaper. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.