Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with the public issue of media ownership and its impact on journalism, specifically addressing the actions of Jeff Bezos and Will Lewis in relation to The Washington Post. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting that their actions are detrimental to the newspaper's integrity and value.
- The statement uses strong language ('murder') which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm with words. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does make strong accusations against specific individuals, which could be seen as disrespectful to their dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead opting for a strong accusatory tone without offering a platform for discussion or rebuttal. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that could be considered irresponsible due to its inflammatory language. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.