In reply to:
Mike Benz
@MikeBenzCyber
·
7d
The statement and conversation involve public discourse as they discuss the filing of FOIA requests related to Jeffrey Epstein's CIA records, which is a matter of public interest and transparency. The conversation highlights concerns about potential CIA obstruction, which could be a significant public issue.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but raises concerns about transparency and accountability, which can be seen as promoting public good. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The conversation respects privacy by focusing on public records and not engaging in personal attacks or harassment. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and transparency by discussing the FOIA process and potential issues with CIA compliance. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The conversation engages in constructive dialogue about government transparency without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.