Rashida Tlaib

Rank 5 of 47
|
Score 172

The statement by Amnesty International is a clear example of public discourse as it addresses the significant public issue of conflict and civilian suffering. The tone is urgent and serious, and the intent is to advocate for a cessation of hostilities to protect civilian lives. The content is a call to action for an immediate ceasefire and provides a link for more detailed information.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement upholds the principle of doing no harm with words and actions by advocating for peace and the protection of civilians. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on the general issue of civilian suffering without targeting any individuals. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding, empathy, and compassion by highlighting the plight of civilians and the need for a ceasefire. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by calling for action from all parties involved in the conflict without engaging in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses Amnesty International's influence to advocate for the betterment of society by seeking to end civilian suffering. [+2]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech by responsibly using its platform to address a critical humanitarian issue with integrity. [+1]