Gary Marcus

The statement in question is a factual clarification in response to an inquiry about Microsoft's relationship with OpenAI. It provides information about the nature of Microsoft's involvement with OpenAI, mentioning exclusive access, a board observer seat, and indirect influence. The tone is neutral and informative, and there is no indication of harm, disrespect, or lack of empathy. The image from Reuters is a news headline that provides context to the conversation, showing Microsoft's stance on Google's competitive edge in AI, which is relevant to the discussion about corporate influence in the AI space.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does no harm as it provides factual information without any negative connotations. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects privacy and dignity by not disclosing sensitive information or engaging in personal attacks. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement is neutral and does not exhibit a lack of empathy or compassion. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement contributes to constructive dialogue by clarifying a point of discussion. [+1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses influence to inform and clarify rather than mislead. [+1]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principles of free speech by contributing to a public conversation responsibly. [+1]