In reply to:
Mitch Harris
@MaharriT
·
578d
The statement is part of a conversation about the ethics of sampling in music, which is a metaphor for using copyrighted data without consent. The tone is conversational and the intent is to contribute to a discussion on copyright infringement and its implications in the context of music production.
- The statement does not seem to intend harm but rather contributes to a discussion on a specific practice in the music industry. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a dialogue with others on a topic of disagreement in a constructive manner. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement respects the principles of free speech by using the platform to discuss a relevant issue responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.