The statement expresses concern about the perceived decline in scientific standards, using the term '#enshittification' to describe the situation. The tone is critical and the intent is to highlight issues with the quality of scientific communication or publication practices.
- The statement uses harsh language that could be seen as harmful to the reputation of the entities involved in the scientific publication process. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others as it does not target any individual directly.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The use of derogatory language does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement aims to engage in constructive criticism of the scientific publication process, although the language used may not be conducive to productive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement seeks to use influence to highlight and potentially correct what the author perceives as a decline in scientific standards. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.