Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 89
3/15/2024, 1:45:15 PM
X
In reply to:
Carlos E. Perez
@IntuitMachine
·
578d
@GaryMarcus @ednewtonrex If I read a book or watched a movie, should I (or any other intelligent agent) be prevented from recalling what was consumed?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
578d
Best analogy for using “publicly available” data that is actually copyrighted, without compensation or consent?

Stealing hubcaps (h/t @ednewtonrex)
Recording a meeting without consent
Kidnapping a child from playground
Other (please specify below)

The statement is part of a conversation about the ethics of using copyrighted material without attribution. The tone is informative and the intent is to clarify a point about intellectual property rights in response to a hypothetical question.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not intend to harm with words or actions, but rather to inform about the importance of attribution, especially in the context of profit. [+1]
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out the importance of attribution, which is a form of respect for the original creator's work. [+1]
  3. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech by engaging in a public discourse on copyright issues responsibly and with integrity. [+1]