In reply to:
bowser
@browserdotsys
·
577d
The statement is part of a conversation about hypothetical scenarios regarding the banning of technology that could potentially harm science or democracy. The tone is conversational and engages in a hypothetical discussion without any harmful intent or content.
- The statement does not intend to harm with words or actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by expressing concern for science and democracy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement is part of a constructive dialogue about the impact of technology on society. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement reflects a desire to use influence for the betterment of society by prioritizing science and democracy. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by engaging in a hypothetical discussion responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.