The statement and accompanying image express concern about the quality of scientific content generated by language models, which the author refers to as 'hallucinations'. The tone is critical and somewhat alarmist, with the use of the term 'enshittification' to describe the perceived degradation of science. The intent is to warn about the potential negative impact of inaccuracies in AI-generated content on scientific discourse and to encourage sharing of the essay to raise awareness.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful to the reputation of AI and those who use it in scientific contexts. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others as it does not target any individual.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The use of derogatory language may not promote understanding or empathy, but rather could incite division. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement invites dialogue about an important issue, although the language used may not be conducive to constructive criticism. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to use influence to alert the scientific community, which could be seen as an attempt to better society by ensuring the integrity of scientific content. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but may not use the platform with the integrity and respect that the principle calls for, due to the language used. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.