In reply to:
Blake Lemoine
@BlakeALemoine
·
576d
The statement '@BlakeALemoine then we are probably fucked. back to the dark ages in some ways.' is a response to concerns about the integrity of the scientific process in the face of challenges posed by large language models (LLMs). The tone is informal and somewhat pessimistic, expressing a belief that the situation could lead to a regression in scientific progress. The image attached to the conversation contains text that criticizes the impact of LLMs on science, using strong language to describe the situation as 'The exponential enshittification of science.'
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as alarmist, which might cause distress or harm to readers who are sensitive to the topic. However, it does not seem to intend to cause harm but rather to express a serious concern. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not target any individual or group. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks a constructive approach to the problem and does not offer solutions, which could be seen as not promoting understanding or empathy. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The use of strong language might not be seen as using influence for the betterment of society, as it could discourage constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.