In reply to:
Jimmy Wales
@jimmy_wales
·
576d
The statement criticizes the practice of using copyrighted material without proper authorization, likening it to theft. It expresses concern over the ethical implications of repurposing content and selling it, which can be seen as a violation of copyright laws. The images provided show examples of original content and their reproduced versions, presumably to illustrate the point being made about the unauthorized use of copyrighted material. The tone of the statement is accusatory and aims to highlight a perceived injustice in the use of copyrighted works.
- The statement aims to prevent harm to copyright holders by calling out what it perceives as theft, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of copyright holders by advocating against the unauthorized use of their work. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of copyright issues and the potential harm caused by unauthorized use, which aligns with promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to argue against a practice that could be harmful to the rights of creators, which aligns with using influence for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by using the platform to discuss copyright issues responsibly and with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.