Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 89

The statement expresses concern about the integrity of scientific content in the wake of AI-generated material, which may contain errors. The tone is urgent and critical, emphasizing the potential negative impact on the credibility of science. The image contains text that uses a colloquial and somewhat derogatory term to describe the perceived decline in quality of scientific content due to AI interventions. The intent is to warn about the risks of uncritical acceptance of AI-generated scientific content and to call for action to preserve the credibility of science.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to protect the integrity of science, which aligns with doing no harm. However, the use of terms like 'garbage' and 'enshittification' could be seen as harsh. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of the scientific community by advocating for its credibility, but the language used may not fully respect the dignity of those who create or use AI technology. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding of the potential issues with AI-generated content but lacks empathy towards those working in AI. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but may not foster constructive dialogue due to its strong language. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to highlight a serious issue, but the approach may not be conducive to the betterment of society if it alienates stakeholders in AI. [-1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to address a concern, but the integrity of the message could be compromised by the choice of language.