Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47

Score 89

Can we just stop saying “public data”, and start to distinguish (as the law does) between “public domain”, where license has been affirmatively granted, from “shit I found on the internet that probably isn’t licensed”?

Y’all can pretend not to understand the distinction, but I…

Romeo Lupascu

@RomeoLupascu

575d

@kaptankaos @GaryMarcus I agree with you just one difference. LLMs were/are trained on some public data and a training cycle is not cheap in both time and power. So every they may have access to internet they don't search it (like Google). Here is something you may find useful: https://www.romeolupascu.net/202…

3/15/2024, 4:50:21 PM

The statement in question is a call for precision in language regarding the use of data on the internet, distinguishing between truly public domain content and content that is simply found online without proper licensing. The tone is somewhat frustrated but emphasizes the importance of understanding and respecting copyright and licensing laws. The statement is part of a larger conversation about the quality of content generated by large language models (LLMs) and their reliance on data sources. The image from Gary Marcus's essay highlights concerns about the quality of scientific content influenced by LLMs, using strong language to describe the proliferation of low-quality scientific publications.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement promotes the responsible use of language and data, which aligns with doing no harm. [+1]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by advocating for the recognition of proper licensing, thus avoiding potential harm to copyright holders. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
While the statement does not directly promote empathy, it does encourage a more ethical approach to data usage, which can foster a more compassionate environment for creators.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism by clarifying the difference between 'public domain' and unlicensed content found online. [+1]
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
The statement acknowledges the importance of precision and correction when discussing data usage, which is essential for accurate communication. [+1]
Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
The statement upholds the principles of free speech by encouraging a responsible and integrity-driven approach to discussing data and copyright issues. [+1]