Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 89
3/15/2024, 4:51:32 PM
X
In reply to:
Reid Southen
@Rahll
·
575d
@alignment_lab @ednewtonrex @ArmUkraineNow @GaryMarcus Since when does something need to be pixel perfect to be copyright infringement? Is bootlegging a moving from a threatre with a camera legal because it's not an exact copy? Can you put a copy of Mickey on a t-shirt and sell it because you shifted some minor details around? No.
Alignment Lab AI
@alignment_lab
·
575d
@ednewtonrex @Rahll @ArmUkraineNow @GaryMarcus the statement was in response to the question of if the systems were "drawing exactly those examples" that it was trained on.

which, in addition to the point i made about how copyright aside, we should just not be training on data if the owners of that data do not want us to,…
Ed Newton-Rex
@ednewtonrex
·
575d
@alignment_lab @Rahll @ArmUkraineNow @GaryMarcus In the context of whether the systems are learning or copying, as you say - are you suggesting that these examples *don't* indicate the system is copying, as opposed to just learning?
Alignment Lab AI
@alignment_lab
·
575d
@Rahll @ednewtonrex @ArmUkraineNow @GaryMarcus you do know what "exact copy" means right?
Reid Southen
@Rahll
·
575d
@alignment_lab @ednewtonrex @ArmUkraineNow @GaryMarcus
Alignment Lab AI
@alignment_lab
·
575d
@ednewtonrex @ArmUkraineNow @GaryMarcus @Rahll well mainly because they were given when i said you wouldnt easily be able to get exact copies from a model

because the question was in regards to whether or not the systems are learning or copying

The statement in question appears to be a lighthearted comment on the ongoing discussion about copyright infringement and the nature of AI-generated content. The 'smudge' remark seems to be a humorous way to point out that even minor imperfections can differentiate a copy from the original, thus contributing to the debate on what constitutes a copyright violation. The tone is conversational and does not seem to be harmful or disrespectful.