Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 89
3/15/2024, 7:01:29 PM
X
In reply to:
Carlos E. Perez
@IntuitMachine
·
572d
@GaryMarcus Seriously, what are you doing?! We can't be conjuring up arguments to appeal to the masses who simply have a naive understanding of WTF is going on!
Carlos E. Perez
@IntuitMachine
·
572d
@GaryMarcus Hobson's choices for hypotheticals can be one way to make a "persuasive" argument.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
572d
@IntuitMachine morons who can’t understand hypotheticals and thought experiments and who misrepresent other people’s views actually seem to be more popular.
Carlos E. Perez
@IntuitMachine
·
572d
Throw the baby out with the bathwater pundits in full swing today.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
572d
Conditions under which you would ban LLMs
a. If they completely polluted the information ecosphere and undermined science
b. If they completely polluted the information ecosphere and undermined democracy
c. Other (specify)
d. None, I am e/acc. Damn the consequences.

The statement appears to be part of a serious discussion on the potential threats to democracy and science posed by certain actions or technologies. The tone is cautionary and the intent seems to be to raise awareness about these issues. The content links to a website with a provocative title that suggests a critical view of the current state of science.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not seem to intend harm but rather to warn about potential dangers, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity, and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding of potential threats, which could foster empathy and compassion for those concerned about democracy and science. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement is part of a dialogue, although it may not be the most constructive form of criticism due to its strong language.
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to raise awareness about societal issues, which could be seen as working for the betterment of society. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to discuss important topics responsibly. [+1]