In reply to:
Derya Unutmaz, MD
@DeryaTR_
·
572d
The statement is part of a conversation about the potential negative impact of language models on scientific research and publication integrity. The tone is critical and expresses concern about the incentives in academia that might lead to the misuse of language models for generating scientific content. The image contains text that criticizes the degradation of scientific content due to errors introduced by language models, using a humorous and exaggerated term to describe the phenomenon.
- The statement raises legitimate concerns about the integrity of scientific research, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not target any individual but discusses a systemic issue. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of a potential issue in scientific publication, which is constructive. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement encourages accountability in the use of language models, which is a form of using influence for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to discuss a matter of public interest responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.