Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 92
Dr Patrick M. - AI Builder
@patmcguinness
·
591d
@dankyoumyfriend @paulg @marlontaze It's not a 'glitch', its a systemic bias Google's employees put into the system to implement work DEI 'diversity' into image generation. It's deliberate rewriting of user prompts to 'create diversity' and the results are absurdity.
3/15/2024, 11:11:19 PM
X
In reply to:
Dave Monlander
@DaveMonlander
·
569d
@GaryMarcus @elonmusk You know that what you ate saying is not true.

You know there was no “ill-conceived prompt rewriting”.

The machine *refused* to generate pictures of white people, but not other peoples. How does that happen with “prompt rewriting”?

The word you are looking for is safeguard.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
569d
C’mon @elonmusk. An ill-considered algorithm for rewriting prompts for an image generator to emphasize diversity is not going to wind up killing people.

We are not (for now) talking about some generally intelligent machine that can control the world in any way possible (e.g.,…
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
·
569d
A friend of mine suggested that I clarify the nature of the danger of woke AI, especially forced diversity.

If an AI is programmed to push for diversity at all costs, as Google Gemini was, then it will do whatever it can to cause that outcome, potentially even killing people.

The conversation thread involves a complex discussion about AI, diversity, and historical accuracy in image generation. The tone varies from critical to accusatory, with some participants alleging bias and others defending the technology. The content touches on the principles of doing no harm, respecting dignity, promoting understanding, engaging in constructive criticism, and using influence responsibly.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statements contain strong language and accusations which could potentially harm reputations and incite further conflict. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    Some statements may not fully respect the dignity of those involved in the development of the AI, as they imply malicious intent or incompetence. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The conversation does not consistently promote understanding; it includes divisive language that may hinder empathetic discourse. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    While there is an attempt at criticism, the tone is often not constructive and may not facilitate productive dialogue. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The use of social media platforms to discuss these issues is responsible, but the manner in which the influence is being used may not be contributing positively to society. [-1]