Reposted by Gary Marcus
Colin Fraser | @colin-fraser.net on bsky
@colin_fraser
·
570d
The statement critiques the performance of language models like ChatGPT in understanding and responding to riddles. It suggests that the model relies on statistical methods rather than genuine comprehension. The tone is critical but not disrespectful or harmful. The conversation involves a riddle that is often used to highlight implicit gender biases.
- The statement does not cause harm and is focused on the capabilities of language models. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement encourages reflection on the nature of AI understanding, which can lead to constructive dialogue about the limitations and capabilities of AI. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement indirectly promotes the betterment of society by highlighting the importance of understanding in AI, which could lead to improvements in technology. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.