The statement expresses disappointment and skepticism regarding OpenAI's commitment to openness, based on the lack of an expected announcement. The tone is critical, and the intent is to question the integrity of OpenAI's actions and statements.
- The statement does not seem to intend harm but expresses frustration and criticism, which could be perceived as negative by some. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement invites dialogue and criticism about OpenAI's practices, which is constructive in nature. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement aims to hold OpenAI accountable, which could be seen as an effort to use influence for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech by using the platform to question and hold a company accountable. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.