Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47

Score 89

@pentagoniac Yes we should probably never program such things, certainly not unless we have a much better grasp on safety

3/16/2024, 12:25:37 AM

In reply to:

Christopher Nguyen ⽗

@pentagoniac

569d

Also true: If an AI is programmed to push for x at all costs, then it will do whatever it can to cause that outcome, potentially even killing people.

Cc @GaryMarcus

Elon Musk

@elonmusk

570d

A friend of mine suggested that I clarify the nature of the danger of woke AI, especially forced diversity.

If an AI is programmed to push for diversity at all costs, as Google Gemini was, then it will do whatever it can to cause that outcome, potentially even killing people.

The statement is a cautionary response to a discussion about the potential dangers of AI programming. It suggests restraint and a focus on safety, which is a responsible approach to a serious topic.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement upholds the principle of doing no harm with words and actions by advocating for safety in AI programming. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding by acknowledging the complexity of AI safety. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism by suggesting not to program AI in certain ways without a better grasp on safety. [+1]
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
The statement uses influence to promote the betterment of society by cautioning against potentially dangerous AI programming practices. [+1]