Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 89
3/16/2024, 4:59:22 PM
X
In reply to:
Manta Rhei
@perpetuummobula
Β·
570d
@GaryMarcus @elonmusk I worry this will be a battle of whose lawyers can be more precise and fastidious about little language details of how to evaluate it. Humans should win this, but I could see the specific explicit language that's chosen going either way.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
Β·
570d
Sneak preview: The proposed bet to @ElonMusk re AI versus humans at the end of 2025 will be for $𝟏𝟎 𝐌𝐒π₯π₯𝐒𝐨𝐧, supported in part by a backer who has come forward.

Details forthcoming.

If you want in (on the side of humans still exceeding AI then in some aspects of…

The statement is part of a conversation about a proposed bet regarding AI versus human capabilities. The tone is speculative and somewhat concerned, but not harmful or disrespectful. The intent seems to be to engage in a dialogue about the rules of the bet, and the content is focused on the potential for legal precision in the bet's evaluation.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to do harm with words or actions.Β [+1]
  2. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement invites the proposal of rules and seems open to constructive dialogue.Β [+1]