In reply to:
Beff Jezos — e/acc ⏩
@BasedBeffJezos
·
571d
The statement is part of a conversation about a technology demo. It provides information and expresses skepticism about the progress of the technology, referencing a past demo for context. The tone is somewhat dismissive but not overtly harmful or disrespectful.
- The statement is skeptical but does not seem to intend harm. It could be perceived as dismissive, which might slightly counter the principle of doing no harm with words. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructiveness. It points out a perceived lack of progress without offering a path for improvement or dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.