In reply to:
Nico
@n1c0h0rn
·
660d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
660d
Julien@Kindrobot
@kindrobot_org
·
660d
Playing simple anagram game with #gemini.
How can it be so wrong ?
Literally everything.
cc @GaryMarcus
How can it be so wrong ?
Literally everything.
cc @GaryMarcus
The statement is a technical critique of AI generalization and transparency issues, contributing to the discourse in the field of artificial intelligence.
- The statement is neutral and informative, doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, avoiding any negative personal commentary. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of AI issues. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism regarding AI transparency. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement avoids personal attacks and focuses on the issue at hand. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement does not acknowledge or correct mistakes, but it is not making any claims that require correction.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement contributes to the betterment of society by advocating for transparency in AI. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.