Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement addresses the impact of AI on scientific literature quality, using strong language to emphasize the potential risks. It invites scrutiny and correction of scientific articles, aiming to protect the integrity of science.
- The provocative language could be seen as harmful, but the intent to protect scientific integrity mitigates this. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement invites scrutiny and discussion. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The call for retraction suggests a willingness to correct errors. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The concern for scientific quality aligns with societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The responsible use of the platform to raise an important issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.