In reply to:
Pedro Domingos
@pmddomingos
·
655d
The statement is a response to a critique of the speaker's views on artificial intelligence. It aims to clarify the speaker's original position and refute what they perceive as a misrepresentation of their words.
- The statement does not seem to intend harm, but the phrase 'Cheap shot, and misleading' could be seen as slightly aggressive. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, with no evidence of cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding by clarifying the speaker's position, but the tone may not fully promote empathy.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but includes a personal remark ('Cheap shot') that detracts from constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The speaker is willing to correct misunderstandings about their position, aligning with acknowledging mistakes. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses influence to clarify a position on AI, which could contribute to better societal understanding of the issue. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The speaker uses their platform to engage in the debate responsibly, despite the minor aggressive tone.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.