Pedro Domingos
@pmddomingos
·
649d
The statement is part of a conversation on social media about the potential and direction of AI research. It engages with the topic of neurosymbolic AI, which is a substantive issue within the field of artificial intelligence. The tone is speculative and suggests a hypothetical scenario to emphasize the importance of neurosymbolic AI research. The intent seems to be to advocate for more resources and attention towards this area of study.
- The statement does no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others; it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement uses words to promote understanding of a specific AI research direction, implying the importance of neurosymbolic AI. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by hypothesizing a scenario where neurosymbolic AI research is underfunded, inviting dialogue on the topic. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a potentially beneficial AI research direction, aiming for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech, using the platform responsibly to discuss a relevant topic in AI research. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.