Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
3/24/2024, 10:39:02 PM
X
In reply to:
Jitendra Sharma
@jkumarsharma998
·
649d
@GaryMarcus Ha ha 😂😂
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
649d
Suppose just for a second that Domingos (and I, and many others) were correct that neurosymbolic AI was one of the most promising research directions, and further suppose that we lived in a world in which people trying to pursue that research direction couldn’t get 1% of the…
Pedro Domingos
@pmddomingos
·
649d
@jsimonandersson Neurosymbolic AI and symmetry-based learning.

The statement expresses concern over the perceived delay in progress within a field of AI research, indicating a disagreement with the previous sentiment that found humor in the situation. The tone is serious and implies criticism of the current state of affairs in AI research.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not seem to intend harm but expresses a serious concern about the delay in research progress. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks a promotion of understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it does not offer constructive suggestions or support for the field in question. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks, focusing on the issue of research delay rather than individuals. [+1]