Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
3/25/2024, 9:05:53 PM
X
In reply to:
Rajesh / Raj
@rkarmani
·
647d
@GaryMarcus would you say the hybrid LLM + search architecture (a la Q*) is in the direction of Option A?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
647d
The choice AI faces, in my eyes
A. spend 100M + now on neurosymbolic AI in order to discover a new path forward

B. Spend another $5-50 B on LLMs before eventually realizing the value of choice A.

Note: $100B on current approaches couldn’t even build a robust L5 driverless car
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
647d
@IanOsband Neurosymbolic done right would be expensive. To be effective (see my Next Decade in AI in Arxiv) likely would requires either licensing or building a large scale knowledge base; it would require hiring minimum say 30-50 people in a period when top people are expecting millions;…

The statement is part of a conversation about AI development strategies, specifically discussing the concept of a hybrid LLM (Large Language Model) and its potential role in AI progress. The tone is inquisitive, seeking clarification on a technical term used in the discussion. The intent is to gain a better understanding of the ideas being presented in the context of AI development options. The content is focused on the technical aspects of AI models and does not directly address broader societal issues or policies.